I hadn't come across this blog until "PhilR" posted this link at The Oil Drum today:
The Falsifiability Question
It's written by someone working in the climate science field. (He's apparently at tu, but I'll try not to hold it against him. ;-) It's a short and interesting piece about why AGW is not really a theory, and what evidence it would take to make him change his mind about it.
Unfortunately, I fear the average denialist just wouldn't understand it.